Hybrid
cars, trucks, and SUVs: All vehicles hybrid
Why
I like the flex-fuel Ford Escape hybrid
Thursday,
February 23, 2006
Lately, there
has been a lot of buzz around ethanol, and suddenly GM
has gone green by going yellow. Yet, a closer look at
the numbers highlights some serious issues.
There are 168,987 gasoline pumps in the United States
and only 608 of them offer ethanol (AutoWeek).
In a previous post, Help
us Detroit, I called GM's ethanol campaign pure
smoke and mirrors.
If GM has put millions of ethanol vehicles on the
road, where are they filling up? Also, why are the far
majority of ethanol vehicles large SUVs and trucks?
Isn't it ironic that most buying this technology
aren't using ethanol, yet GM still receives CAFE
credits for using the technology? If GM cares so much
about ethanol, why isn't the technology in all
vehicles, rather than just vehicles near failing CAFE?
Yes, ethanol offers great potential as a fuel, but not
today. In fact, some analysts suggest that it could
take 15 years before ethanol could really start making
a difference, which is why I like the flex-fuel
Ford Escape hybrid.
The Escape
hybrid is already a great vehicle, reducing the
conventional Escape's fuel consumption by between 20
and 30 percent, while also significantly reducing
pollution. The flex-fuel Escape hybrid vehicle offers
these same gains, plus the ability to use ethanol.
In 10 years, both ethanol and the technology behind hybrid
cars will advance, but neither will offer a real
solution to oil dependence. In 10 years; however, a plug-in
flex-fuel hybrid vehicle could easily and
economically function without oil - not just foreign
oil - while continuing to push the bar for fuel
economy.
I like ethanol and I like hybrid vehicles, but I
really like flex-fuel hybrids. And if plug-in
technology is added to those flex-fuel hybrids we add
even greater fuel economy, while sparking greater
competition and variety in fuel choices.
Shouldn't something as important as energy be about
choice, especially in today's world?