If the Volt is 'technologically feasible' by 2010, then how can 35 mpg not be?Congress and Detroit. Two peas in a pod? If there was ever a common element between politicians and automakers, it has to be vision. Or, more precisely, a lack thereof.
O.K., the House of Reps. is going to delay any action regarding fuel economy until Fall - something that will make automakers breathe a little easier the next few months. While automakers show off fancy cars, possibly able to achieve 100 mpg by 2012, they also continue to argue that 35 mpg is not 'technologically feasible' by 2020 - a claim
I disputed on Tuesday.
Yet, not only is 35 mpg easily 'technologically feasible' by 2020, it is even more economically feasible than not achieving this higher level of CAFE, according to a new study cited by
Edmunds.
"Detroit's automakers would collectively earn $14.4 billion by 2017, the study says, under the toughest standards being considered by Congress: a combined car and truck average of 35 mpg by 2018. The U of M auto brain trust calculates that indexing mileage targets to vehicle size wouldn't penalize Detroit with its truck-heavy lineups the way the existing car and truck standards do. Instead, the domestic automakers would be allowed to aim for a lower target — around 33 mpg — while Japanese rivals that are top-heavy with passenger cars might need to average 38 mpg. "
Why doesn't Congress get off its ass and do something meaningful? Forcing, while helping, Detroit to build as many
hybrid cars today, while developing tomorrow's
plug-in hybrids, seems to be the best thing Congress could do for Detroit - and America.
So, show some vision already!
Labels: cafe, chevy volt hybrid, congress, fuel economy, hybrid cars, plug-in hybrid vehicles