Stupidity: Global warming alarmists versus critics

Is there a downside to taking global warming too seriously?

I'm not a global warming alarmist. I do, however, believe that humans should take the possibility of human-caused global warming seriously. Apparently, the Supreme Court feels the same, which irks many, including Edmunds.com's Karl on Cars.

Suddenly, Karl is more educated on the causes of global warming than are many scientists specializing in climate studies. Now that is a stupid idea.

Yes, humans might be a minor cause of global warming via CO2 emissions. Or, perhaps global warming is ultimately good for humans in its ice age prevention. Still, the alarmists might be correct and humans cannot act quickly enough. Ultimately, there is evidence supporting all 3 positions - that is a fact. Yet for Karl and many global warming critics, only one side of the story is important.

Finish Karl on Cars CO2 stupidity